🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive action to restrict social networking access for those under 16 is sending ripples around the globe. Lawmakers, campaigners, and guardians are monitoring with great interest to see if this tactic will become a template for other nations.

The European Movement

In Europe, a rising group of states are exploring parallel bans.

• The Danish government has stated a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister stating that phones and networks are "robbing our youngsters' childhood". A law is expected to be formalized next year.
• Norway is planning to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to protect the young from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is working on a online verification tool to authenticate the age and identity of social media participants. Authorities have suggested that an Australian-model ban remains "a potential options on the table".
• In Spain, the president has urged parliament to approve a law lifting the access age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a similar action, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has urged families to prevent their kids from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has adopted a advisory resolution demanding a ban for minors unless parental consent is given. While it highlights of the "compulsive" design of these services, the move does not establish mandatory rules.

"A strong age barrier is a solid starting point," said the parliamentarian driving the initiative.

Britain: A Watchful Stance

In the UK, the leadership has kept open a future ban, emphasizing that "nothing is off the table" but insisting any action must be "supported by robust data".

Last year, interest grew behind a bill to enact controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually modified. However, the government vowed to further research the issue.

Advocacy groups have expressed concerns. One foundation founded by the family of a young person who was lost after encountering dangerous social media material suggests that a blanket age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could result in a "cliff edge" of harm when young people turn 16.

"This ban is a response to the failure of the tech sector to create tools that are secure and fit for young users," stated a influential child protection advocate.

America: A Fragmented Landscape

Stateside, regulation is primarily happening at the local level due to country-wide stalemate.

• Utah mandates guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and limits overnight use.
• Florida has signed a law barring children under fourteen from joining social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• The state of Virginia has passed a law restricting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with extra use requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also passed measures mandating guardian approval for teenagers to set up social media presences.

Even with cross-party agreement and calls from various individuals to copy the Australian path, a federal ban is currently seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Views

Beyond these regions, additional countries are similarly exploring options.

• The Malaysian government aims to restrict social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• Brazil has increased the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, world agencies take a more measured stance. Unicef has advised that age-based restrictions carry risks and "could prove counterproductive". The agency notes that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for isolated young people and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to invest in safety.

As this global debate continues, the actions of this nation and others indicate that policymakers internationally are increasingly prepared to delay for tech companies to act voluntarily.